Peshawar High Court bench temporarily banned interviews of suspected criminals in police’s custody by journalists and social media channels
FOE Link or motive by PPF
ConfirmedCase Update Status
Journalists have filed petition against this decision
Summary of Case
"Dawn: On February 13, 2024,a Peshawar High Court bench temporarily banned interviews of suspected criminals in police’s custody by journalists and social media channels. Justice Ijaz Anwar and Justice Syed M Attique Shah also directed the provincial inspector general of police to respond to a petition of lawyer Jabir Khan, who sought orders for the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority to immediately ban the telecast of media interviews of crime suspectsduringtheir investigation. The court directed the police not to allow media interviews of those suspects in custody until further orders. The petitioner requested the court to direct the federal and provincial governments to act against media outlets, television channels, Facebook account holders and YouTubers telecasting and uploading the interviews of suspected outlaws during investigation and trial. He also sought orders for the police to block the access of journalists, TV reporters, vloggers, YouTubers and Facebook activists to the police station and prisons for interviewing those suspects. Senior lawyer Ziaur Rehman Tajik appeared for the petitioner and said such interviews should be declared unconstitutional and against fundamental rights and the dignity of man as well as the fair trial promised in Articles 10-A and 14 of the Constitution. He contended that it had become a practice of journalists and members of media outlets, YouTube channels and vlogs that they interviewed suspected outlaws during investigation soon after their arrest in utter violation of Article 14 of the Constitution, which guaranteed the dignity of the man. Mr Tajik said it was a violation of the Constitution by several electronic and social media outlets to telecast or upload interviews of suspected criminals online. “Freedom of speech, press and expression is the fundamental right of every citizen as provided by Article 19 of the Constitution, but that right is also subject to reasonable restriction imposed by the law and that the integrity, decency and moral rights of an accused should not be violated,” he said. The lawyer contended that such practices affected trials of the accused. He argued that interviewing a suspected criminal in custody was not only against the laws of defamation and contempt of court but it also amounted to influencing the free and fair trial of an individual and impartial investigation, a violation of Article 10-A of the Constitution. Justice Ijaz Anwar wondered what would be the people’s impression about the judiciary if a suspect admitted to committing a crime during a social media interview and got acquitted. The bench observed that in the presence of media trials of the accused, trying the accused by the courts of law became needless. Mr Tajik said TV channels, YouTubers and vloggers interviewed suspected criminals and tried to prove them guilty even before the conclusion of their trials by the courts. The counsel said as the Pemra and police department had not been performing their respective duties in accordance with the law, media interviews of the accused in custody were on the rise. The respondents in the petition are the federal government through the information secretary, Pemra through its chairman, and KP chief secretary, information secretary and police chief.
Category of Incident
Censorship
ICCS Status
ICCS Divisions: 0803-Acts related to freedom of expression or control of expression
ICCS Group: 08039-Other acts related to freedom of expression or control of expression
ICCS Class: 08039-Other acts related to freedom of expression or control of expression
ICCS Crime: Acts related to freedom of expression or control of expression
Reported By
Dawn
Date of incident
13
Month
February
Year
2024
Name of affected person
All reporters and journalists covering PHC.
Other affected persons
All reporters and journalists covering PHC.
Name of affected organization
All organizations
Other affected organizations
All organizations
Action by
Peshawar High Court (PHC)
City
Peshawar
Province
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Designation
Court Reporter
Professional category
Journalist
Age of victim
N/A
Marital Status
N/ACompensation Details
Amount of compensation announced by government: No compensation was announced
Date of compensation announcement by government:
Date of compensation paid by government:
Amount of compensation announced by others:
Date of compensation announced by others:
Date compensation paid by others:
FIR Details
Was FIR registered ?: No
Court Details
Was case investigated ?: Yes
Court where case was presented: Peshawar High Court
Name of prosecuting lawyer: Jabir Khan
Date of first court hearing:
Date of last court hearing:
Status of court case: Journalists have filed petition against this decision.
Journalist Union Status
PFUJ
No version was recorded
APNS
CPNE
PBA
Condemn Status
Colleague of victim
No version was recorded
Employer organization
No version was recorded
Press Club Status
Press club 1: No version was recorded
Press club 2:
Press club 3: